Mosher【就是毛思迪——转注】在1980年左右曾在中国做人口学研究，他关于中国强迫人工流产的文章1981 年在台湾发表后，惹怒了中国政府，斯坦福大学于1983年以其违背研究伦理、从事非法 活动为由将他开除。他起诉斯坦福大学。这个案件在1984年——也就是傅苹到美国那一 年——非常有名，但现在已很少有人知道了。傅苹突然提起她刚到美国时很著名而现在 已鲜为人知的这个案子，让我不得不怀疑她当年正是根据Mosher的案子来捏造她的论文 故事，以此申请政治避难的。
联合国人口基金并在国际社会宣传中国计划生育是自愿的，不存在强制堕胎[1]。 美国斯坦福大学博士生Steven W. Mosher（中文名：毛思迪） 1979年-1980年去中国调研（是第一个访问中国的美国社会学者）。他当时是持pro-choice（选择优先）观点的无神论者，但目睹中国残忍的强制计划生育之后，他成为了一名pro-life（生命优先）的天主教徒[23]。他回国之后，向美国社会揭示了中国强制堕胎、强制结扎的现实，并展示了一些残忍的相片，但他被取消博士学位[24]。
In 1979 Mosher became the first American research student to conduct anthropological research in rural China after the Cultural Revolution. At the time he was married to a woman from Guangdong province, and for several months between 1979 and 1980 lived in rural Guangdong. He also traveled to Guizhou,[2] a remote and rarely visited part of China. In 1981 Mosher was denied re-entry to China by the Chinese government, which considered he had broken its laws and acted unethically.Mosher was expelled from Stanford University's Ph.D program after publishing an article in Taiwan about his experiences in Guangdong. This expulsion occurred shortly before the publication of Broken Earth. The Chinese government was angry and embarrassed by the contents of the book, which revealed among other things that forced abortions were common in that part of China as a part of the one-child policy. Chinese commentators say that Stanford University was put in an awkward situation because Mosher went to places he was not allowed to go. He also released photographs of Chinese women having abortions with their faces exposed, a violation of personal privacy, according to standards of anthropological ethics.[3] He was expelled from Stanford University due to "illegal and unethical conduct." The Mosher case became a cause célèbre in the academic world,[4] for it was said[5] that Stanford acted under pressure from the Chinese government, which threatened to withhold permission for future Stanford researchers to visit China. However, Stanford said that its concern was that Mosher's informants had been put in jeopardy and that this was contrary to anthropological ethics.[6]
联系客服
