The list of the sources for such analysis is necessarily selective. The main purpose of the selection was to comply with the needs of a course offered for Chinese students, “Erasmus” students from different European countries, as well as Hungarian students of the Faculty of Law, University of Szeged. Through the topics covered by the book students will get familiarized with major copyright policies and practices of the European Union and the United States of America, as well as their international background.
我们要对分析的来源进行精心挑选的目的就是为中国留学生，欧盟其他国家的伊拉斯谟学生以及匈牙利学生开设能够扩展法学能力的赛格德大学课程。通过对于书本中议题的学习可以使的学生对版权政策以及对欧盟和美国的国际惯例的熟悉。
Readings include chapters discussing the problems through comparative method, analysing statutory sources and case law from multiple jurisdictions. These theoretical, analytical readings are supplemented by court decisions. The latter are edited where necessary, leaving only the most important elements of the – sometimes really long – judgments for discussion and debate. Decisions will be analysed through the „IRAC” method used especially by U.S. law schools.
本书的阅读材料包含了通过对比法、分析法以及大量的判例法对问题进行讨论的章节。这些理论与分析材料都是被作为法庭决议的补充参考。前后做了必要编排，只留下一些比较冗长的判决书中最重要的部分，以供讨论与研究。我们使用美国大部分法学院经常使用的“iRAC”法对判例进行研究。
The term „IRAC” is the abbreviation of the process through which the case is dissected into four parts. „I” is for issue, „R” is for the rules, „A” is for the arguments and finally „C” is for conclusion. The issue includes all the relevant facts of the case. The correct understanding of these facts is the cornerstone of a further proper analysis of any decision. This requires the accurate knowledge of both basic legal definitions and – in case of digital copyright disputes – the skill to correctly categorize technological features of the quarrels. Rules include both statutes (and other regulations) and precedents. As students will experience, referring to former court decisions has become general both in the Anglo-Saxon countries (like the United States and the United Kingdom) and more recently in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Arguments cover both the statements and evidences of parties and the reasoning used by judges in reaching the final conclusion. Law students are the lawyers of the future and they might face similar legal troubles during their career. It is really important for students to properly understand these arguments. Studying how parties succeeded or failed to win a case is extremely useful to improve students’ personal skills of argumentation. Similarly, learning how judges reach a specific conclusion is inevitable to acquire the ability to effectively predict future court decisions. And finally conclusion is the heart of the judgment: material facts, binding rules and relevant arguments mixed into sentences that sum up precisely how the judge solves the whole debate.
术语“IRAC”是四大块部分的缩写。”I”代表争论焦点，“r”代表法规，“a”代表抗辩，最后，“c”代表着结论。此述的争论焦点包含着案件相关的有助于我们更好的理解案件的事实，而我们就需要精确掌握基本的法律含义以及技能以便能从诉讼中归纳要件。法规则包含着法律条文（以及一部分规章）与判例。正如我们的学生会看到的，我们的规则包含了制定法与判例法，里面包含了很多以前的判决，比如安格鲁撒克逊（英国或者美国）以及欧盟的判决。抗辩过程由当事人提供的陈述与证据组成，并以此得出最终判决。那些以律师作为自己职业目标的法学生在将来的职业生涯中可能会面对着相同的问题。对于法学生来讲，必须要认识到抗辩的重要性。提升法学生在案件中的辩论技巧的非常有用的方式是学习研究当事人成败的原因以及了解法官是如何得出具体的判决的过程。最后的结论则是整个判决的核心：客观事实，现行法规以及有关的抗辩结合在一起，增加法官对于案件判决的精准性。
The author of this book is convinced that participants of the planned course will get familiarized with the practice-oriented, analytical aspect on the hot topics mentioned above. The comparative legal aspect allows the students to understand the major differences between the common law and the continental legal systems to be able to study or criticize the different legal solutions. This approach will help the students to use European, American and international copyright law rules in their future career at law firms or at courts, and to undertake independent research on the subject, using both traditional and internet resources.
本书作者相信课程计划参与者将会熟悉对热点话题以实践为中心的角度进行分析。学生通过比较法来理解英美法系（common law做普通法，又可做不成文法理解，此处建议翻译成英美法系与大陆法系对应）与大陆法系的主要区别，并通过这种方法学习与批判不同的法学解决方案（different legal solutions 应该有一种更好的表达）。这种方式有助于学生通过传统方式以及互联网资源在以后的法律生涯中更好的运用欧洲、美国、以及国际上对于著作权的法律规定，还有助于学生在学术上的独立研究。
最后，那些致力于深度分析的人，可能在将来会参照此书编写出更好的教科书。
联系客服
