NeoSTAR (NCT04230109): Sacituzumab Govitecan In TNBC (A Phase 2 Study of Response-guided Neoadjuvant Sacituzumab Govitecan in Patients With Localized Triple-Negative Breast Cancer)
Ann Oncol. 2023 Dec 12. IF: 50.5
Response-guided neoadjuvant sacituzumab govitecan for localized triple negative breast cancer: results from the NeoSTAR trial.
Spring LM, Tolaney SM, Fell G, Bossuyt V, Abelman RO, Wu B, Maheswaran S, Trippa L, Comander A, Mulvey T, McLaughlin S, Ryan P, Ryan L, Abraham E, Rosenstock A, Garrido-Castro AC, Lynce F, Moy B, Isakoff SJ, Tung N, Mittendorf EA, Ellisen LW, Bardia A.
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Ludwig Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
HIGHLIGHTS
Neoadjuvant treatment with sacituzumab govitecan for localized TNBC is safe and feasible
Approximately 2/3 of patients responded to neoadjuvant SG alone, and 30% achieved pCR without additional chemotherapy.
Higher Ki-67 and TILs were predictive of pCR to SG, while TROP2 expression was not.
BACKGROUND: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a novel antibody-drug conjugate targeting Trop2, is approved for pre-treated metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC). We conducted an investigator-initiated clinical trial evaluating neoadjuvant (NA) SG (NCT04230109), and report primary results
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants with early-stage TNBC received NA SG for 4 cycles. The primary objective was to assess pathological complete response (pCR) rate in breast and lymph nodes (ypT0/isN0) to SG. Secondary objectives included overall response rate (ORR), safety, event-free survival (EFS), and predictive biomarkers. A response-guided approach was utilized, and subsequent systemic therapy decisions were at the discretion of the treating physician.
RESULTS: From July 2020-August 2021, 50 participants were enrolled (median age = 48.5; 13 clinical stage I disease, 26 stage II, 11 stage III). Forty-nine (98%) completed 4 cycles of SG. Overall, the pCR rate with SG alone was 30% (n= 15, 95% CI 18%, 45%). The ORR per RECIST V1.1 after SG alone was 64% (n= 32/50, 95% CI 77%, 98%). Higher Ki-67 and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were predictive of pCR to SG (p = 0.007 for Ki-67; 0.002 for TILs), while baseline TROP2 expression was not (p = 0.440). Common AEs were nausea (82%), fatigue (76%), alopecia (76%), neutropenia (44%), and rash (48%). With a median follow-up time of 18.9 months (95% CI 16.3, 21.9), the 2-year EFS for all participants was 95%. Among participants with a pCR with SG (N = 15), the 2-year EFS was 100%.
CONCLUSION: In the first NA trial with an ADC in localized TNBC, SG demonstrated single-agent efficacy and feasibility of response-guided escalation/de-escalation. Further research on optimal duration of SG as well as NA combination strategies, including immunotherapy, are needed.
KEYWORDS: ADC; sacituzumab govitecan; neoadjuvant; triple-negative breast cancer; TROP2
DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.018
联系客服